Skip navigation.
Home
Orchids Online
Home » Image Galleries » Phalaenopsis

Phalaenopsis amabilis

Submitted by Albert on Fri, 18/01/2008 - 15:41

Phalaenopsis amabilis

Edit as per comments below

Thanks again for clarification.
Albert

Phalaenopsis amabilis
»

Photos aren't lost Albert

Submitted by mcorchid on Fri, 18/01/2008 - 23:09.

It's simply a case of transferring them from the old Website to this new one.

Well ok it's not that simple, each one has to be moved individually and that takes time, and there are a lot of photos and info that needs to be moved.

Wellsy has done a great job getting the Site back this far considering he holds down a full time job away from home on the other side of Australia using a satellite link.

Be patient, it will all come together.

Regards Bill

»

Phalaenopsis

Submitted by danielptong on Sat, 19/01/2008 - 11:48.

Hi Albert,
Is this Phal. a species? It looks like Phal. amabilis to me.
Regards, Daniel.

»

I tend to agree with you Daniel

Submitted by wellsy on Sat, 19/01/2008 - 11:53.

I tend to agree with you Daniel it's P. amabilis I think...nice one as well

Regards wellsy

»

Phal unknown

Submitted by Albert on Sat, 19/01/2008 - 18:14.

Thanks mates,
I also checked it yesterday- yes its an amabilis.
Thanks again'Albert

»

Phalaenopsis

Submitted by Albert on Sat, 19/01/2008 - 18:13.

Hi there,
I still have my doubts- could it be also a Phal. philippinense/leucorhoda???
Thanks
Albert

»

Compare yours with this one

Submitted by wellsy on Sat, 19/01/2008 - 19:01.

Compare yours with this one which I know is as described Albert. http://orchidsonline.com.au//node/1154

Looks a match to me really. Your thoughts?

This one is Phalaenopsis philippinense http://orchidsonline.com.au/node/1155

Regards wellsy

»

aphrodite

Submitted by mcorchid on Sat, 19/01/2008 - 20:04.

I think we should look at Phal. aphrodite as well.

Bill

»

amabilis

Submitted by bernabu on Thu, 28/08/2008 - 23:41.

Checked in Cribbs book. Sure looks like amabilis to me.
bernabu

»

Albert

Submitted by mcorchid on Fri, 29/08/2008 - 07:29.

Sorry Albert, looks like we missed sorting this one out some time back.

I agree with Wellsy and Bernard that your flower is Phal. amabilis not Phal. philippinense. Your flower has side lobe mid-spurs, Phal philippinese does not have them.

Will edit to Phal. amabilis (29-08-08)

Bill

»